Tuesday, November 01, 2016

  • Tuesday, November 01, 2016
  • Elder of Ziyon
Last May, Zman magazine did a feature article on media watchdogs, featuring Honest Reporting, CAMERA and me. I mentioned it at the time.

Here is the full article as a PDF, courtesy of the magazine.  You probably have to make it full screen to read it.



Here is the full text of just the section of the article that talks about EoZ:
Unlike HonestReporting and CAMERA, the next watchdog, Elder of Ziyon (EoZ), is basically a one-man show. And he works anonymously; he did not even divulge his real name for our phone interview.
When we asked him via email what he could tell us about his true identity, he responded, “I live in the New York area, I have at least two married kids, ‘Mrs. Elder’ has been contributing to my [news summary] videos lately and we are shomer Shabbos.”
Why the anonymity? “I prefer to stay anonymous mostly for career reasons. I have a full-time job in a high-tech field, so I don’t want potential employers to see my thousands of articles about the Middle East.”
Given the fact that he has published a staggering 23,000 articles in 11 years on his website, it boggles the mind to think he has a full-time job and only works on watchdogging part-time.
The name “Elder of Ziyon” is meant to be ironic, he explains, cynically poking fun at rabid anti-Semites who have long used the term as a reference to the canard that a small cabal of Jews controls the world. Indeed, one of the ways he combats the bias and hatred is with his very sharp wit and wry sense of humor. For instance, when Arabs, Islamists and ultra-leftists began calling Gaza a “concentration camp,” EoZ posted a series of photographs and videos showing a Gazan luxury mall, an exclusive nightclub, markets teeming with food, throngs of Gazans relaxing on beaches, etc. -- and described the photos with captions such as:

  • On Saturday night, the starving people of Gaza opened up a luxury mall.
  • Thousands of Gazans were forced to search desperately for sales and specials.
  • “We are forced to squirt Zionist ketchup onto our French fries, showing that we are still under colonial occupation.”
  • “Our children suffer the most. Here they are playing video games that are over three years old!”
  • Hamas dignitaries and other Gazans suffering at the Roots Club in the heart of the Gaza “concentration camp.”
  • Caution: Viewer discretion is advised due to graphic scenes of indulgence in gourmet food and similar types of exotic experiences and ambiance.

Along with his own writings and graphics, he posts articles authored by selected columnists. In addition, twice a day he excerpts and links dozens of articles about Israel published in media outlets around the globe. The rigorous job of finding all those articles and posting them is done by someone he identifies only as “Ian from Australia.”
How does he choose the topics of his own articles? “I try to be as original as possible. Either I try to dig up stories in English that most people would have missed, or I find stories in Arabic that everybody would have missed.”
Arabic?! Do you know Arabic? “No, but I use Google Translate and verify it with experts if there is something I’m not sure about.”
When asked why he goes to Arabic sources, he explains that Arab leaders typically have two faces: that which they show the Western press in their official statements and that which they show their own people. For instance, at the same time the media was claiming that Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas was condemning the recent wave of violence, the organization he heads was bragging on its Arabic Facebook page that he was inspiring the murders of Jews. Translating these sources exposes the truth of their intentions, something the Western press avoids. (There is an entire media watchdog, The Middle East Media Research Institute [MEMRI], which devotes its resources to monitoring and translating Arabic media, schoolbooks and religious sermons.)
Elder of Ziyon elaborates for us:

One of my pet peeves is not so much media bias, that they say things which are biased (which they do); but what kills me and drives me nuts is what they don’t report on. The crimes of omission of the media…. That’s where the bias is….
Quotes from Palestinian leaders that would generate world headlines had an Israeli politician said something similar are completely ignored. The official pronouncements on the Facebook page of Fatah, Mahmoud Abbas’ party, are so much worse by any objective measure. Yet, they are never reported. These crimes of omission are widespread, and the clearest indication that the media is hugely biased against Israel.

The irony is that these omissions take place even though the number of Western journalists in Israel is absurdly disproportionate to the number of those covering events in other parts of the Middle East, and even the world. As Matti Friedman, former editor for the Associated Press’ Jerusalem bureau, said: “The agency had more than 40 staffers covering Israel and the Palestinian territories. That was significantly more news staff than the AP had in China, Russia, or India, or in all of the 50 countries of sub-Saharan Africa combined! It was higher than the total number of news-gathering employees in all the countries where the uprisings of the “Arab Spring” eventually erupted!” EoZ commented:

All of the reporters who are over there -- and there are more reporters per square kilometer in Israel than there are anywhere else -- act like sheep. They just follow the leader, which is usually The New York Times, sometimes Reuters, and file almost identical stories with identical pictures. They travel around in packs and cover the same stories and take the same pictures. But they don’t go anywhere beyond the standard politically correct stories that they want to say, and they all have to adhere to the same meme that Likud is an extremist, rightist party; Israel isn’t interested in peace; the “occupation” and “settlements” are the main obstacle to peace; Fatah is a moderate party and Abbas is a moderate leader….
That’s what drives me nuts about how the media covers Israel. They’re not trying to be objective. This is provable by what they are not saying. There is so much intensive obsession and analysis of every word and every letter that comes out from any Israeli official, but there is nothing on what comes out from Abbas and the like….
There are terror groups literally operating under the Fatah party -- the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, and a few offshoots -- and the media doesn’t even mention that they exist. And they’re not only in Gaza. They’re also in the West Bank. And they will sometimes parade around with their guns. They are Fatah. They are part of Abbas’ party. He claimed that he had dismantled them, but he lied. Yet, nobody in the press asks, “Hey, what’s going on here? Why is moderate Abbas allowing this?”

Among the many articles EoZ has linked to his site are some authored by journalists who testify to the truth that the foreign press is “ignorant, lazy, and fearful,” and that journalists risk “professional ostracism” if they veer from the accepted Palestinian-slanted narrative. (See accompanying article.)
We asked EoZ to comment on the fact that some of the worst reporting originates from Jewish journalists:

I do think that Jewish reporters try to bend over backwards to prove that they are as evenhanded as possible. It’s not true of everyone… I don’t think you can make a blanket statement. But there’s no doubt.... Jodi Rudoren, when she was in Israel, was trying clearly to be evenhanded. But evenhandedness is still bias, because you are still making the assumption that both sides are equally guilty when they are clearly not….
[But it’s not only a Jewish complex; it’s a Western complex.] It’s something the West doesn’t want to understand because they want to make it look like everyone is the same. “Everybody loves their kids, and everybody wants to be alive.” They don’t want to report how [Palestinian-Arab-Muslim] parents are proud they are that their children are suicide bombers or want to be…. They [the Western media] don’t want to report that, on any given day, there are multiple statements made by public officials discussing the glories of committing murder against Jews.
That would make it seem as if there is a difference [in the mindset and values]. And if there’s a difference, the whole narrative falls apart. [So the Western media intentionally ignores the constant stream of rabid incitement.]

What about the contention these days in so much of the media that Palestinian violence is justified because of the Israeli “occupation” and “the settlements”?

Was there peace before 1967? The [Arab] threats were worse then. With the establishment of the PLO in 1964, there were no “settlements” -- so what exactly were the Palestinians planning to “liberate”?
It has nothing to do with settlements, nothing to do with occupation. Now, you can have an argument over whether it’s smart to keep them -- I don’t think it’s automatically anti-Israel to say that you think Israel should withdraw from part or all; reasonable people will have that opinion. But the settlements are not the real issue….
And, if you look carefully at all the statements from Mahmoud Abbas, or whoever else, the settlements are only one of their issues. Jerusalem is another of their issues, even more important to them.
And yet another [of their issues], which they mention every time in every forum they have, is the so-called “right of return.” And that is the destruction of Israel; everybody understands that it is meant to be the destruction of Israel. The whole reason there is still a refugee problem is in order to keep that issue alive, in order to put pressure on Israel.

To supply a little historical perspective on his point: In 1948, after the Arabs lost the war they started hoping to annihilate about 600,000 Jews in Eretz Yisrael, there were many refugees. The United Nations established UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency) as a humanitarian effort to relieve the plight of the refugees. At the time, this included both Jewish and Arab displaced persons living within the Armistice lines in the State of Israel.
By 1952, all of those Jews and Arabs had been moved to permanent homes and were taken off the UNRWA list of refugees. However, all of those Arabs living in territories occupied by Arab states continued to be defined as refugees. This included the two largest groups, the refugees in Gaza, who were living under Egyptian occupation, and those in the West Bank, under Jordanian occupation. Even after Jordan extended citizenship to the refugees there, thereby ending their refugee status according to international law, UNRWA continued classifying them as refugees! In effect, the UN bestowed upon them the status of permanent refugees -- something unprecedented! (Note: After 1948, more than 800,000 Jews had to flee Arab lands due to incitement and expulsion, yet they soon resettled elsewhere, ending their refugee status.)
Put another way, at some point in the 1950s, UNRWA changed from a humanitarian organization seeking to solve a refugee problem into a propaganda arm of the Arab cause, using Arab refugees (originally they were called “Arab refugees”; now they are called “Palestinian refugees”) as a political weapon against the State of Israel.
This is the background to the “right of return” issue. Elder of Ziyon continues:
>>> 
He [Abbas] doesn’t emphasize it so much when he speaks to the West, but in virtually every speech he makes elsewhere he says that they have to have the right to return to these homes -- homes that don’t exist anymore!
The basic question of why “refugee” camps exist in the territory under Palestinian rule is not mentioned…. The unspoken truth is that the “refugee” camps exist for only one reason -- to blame Israel for not allowing them to “return” to homes that no longer exist….
The entire idea of the right of return is baseless. Yet, it is being used as a political football…. And just as today you see all this rhetoric about occupation and settlements -- that’s the endless mantra -- if for any reason a future Israeli government decides to compromise and gives up some or all the settlements, the next battlefield is going to be this “right of return.”
<<< 
If the settlements are not the true issue, what really motivates the media to constantly demonize Israel? Is it anti-Semitism?
>>> 
Not all anti-Israel criticism stems from anti-Semitism (or Jewish self-hatred). But certainly some of it does. When it comes to the Arab-Muslim media, such as PA-TV and the official PA media outlets, the majority of it is [anti-Semitic]. The focus on Israel as evil is certainly motivated mostly by anti-Semitism. The canard of Israel controlling the US, as well as the recycled anti-Semitic ideas of control of the media and banks, is as prevalent today [in the Middle East] as it was before World War Two.
However, European and US criticism of Israel is not as clear-cut. Their anti-Israel bias may have some subtle relationship with anti-Semitism, but it is also a result of a fear of Arab terror. During the 1970s, we saw a remarkable transformation from Arab-Palestinians as terrorists to Arafat being invited to address the UN in a very short time period -- thanks to the Arab terrorist airline hijackings and the oil embargo [see Zman 8]. The West, in fear of terror and blackmail, chose to start to take the Arab side to avoid being a victim; they then justified their caving in to terror after the fact by pretending that the terrorists had a valid point. [Note: This may be something akin to the Stockholm Syndrome, the psychological tendency of a victim/hostage to bond with, identify with, or sympathize with his or her persecutor/captor. See Zman 12.]
That mentality exists today: Reporters in Israel know that Israel won’t throw them into jail for writing critical stories. But the reporters in Gaza or the West Bank have to toe the line in order to keep their sources and their jobs. Fear is a very big motivator.
<<< 

War of the Words

During the interview, we discussed the “war of the words” going on. For instance, the fact that “Palestinian” in today’s press refers to non-Jewish Arabs is particularly painful for anyone familiar with Jewish history, since it originates from the Roman Emperor Hadrian’s campaign to annihilate the Jews about 1,900 years ago.
Hadrian was the closest thing in history to Hitler, committing the greatest genocide against Jews until the Holocaust. Not content merely murdering Jews, he sought to eliminate the Jewish religion (e.g., it was his decree outlawing the public teaching of Torah that led to Rabbi Akiva’s martyrdom). As part of his campaign to wipe out the memory of the Jewish people he renamed Judea, the Jewish homeland, “Palestine.”
Even though the name “Palestine” is not mentioned even once in Tanach -- neither is it mentioned in the Christian writings or the Quran -- the name was revived in the modern era by the British… but they used it to describe the territory intended to be the Jewish homeland! That’s right -- the Jews were the original “Palestinians” of the modern era. It wasn’t until the 1960s that Yasser Arafat -- the “father of modern terrorism” -- absconded the term for political purposes. Those who use the term “Palestinian” today to refer to the Arabs pay homage to Arafat and his spin on reality. 
We asked Elder of Ziyon his opinion:

Using the word “Palestinians” to refer to Arabs in British Mandate Palestine pre-1948 is almost always wrong. Jews were the ones who referred to themselves that way. The mainstream media did not refer to Arabs as “Palestinians” until roughly 1967 (with a few exceptions). I dislike using the word “Palestinian” to refer to Arabs in the region, but unfortunately I have to use it if I want my writings to be read outside the pro-Israel echo chamber.

We asked him what other terms can serve as examples.

The term “West Bank” is also a relatively new term, starting after the 1948 war. Up until then, and even in UN documents, the area was always referred to as “Judea and Samaria.”
“Illegal settlements” and “illegal occupation” are other false phrases…. There are lots of other terms that have gained currency: “apartheid,” which is absurd; “genocide” in Gaza, which is even more absurd. The New York Times recently used the word “resistance” without scare quotes to refer to Palestinian Arab terror, fully accepting the terminology of the terrorists.
“Refugee” means something completely different when the subject is Palestinian Arab than any other kind of refugee [see above]. Calling the Har HaBayit the “Al Aqsa Mosque” is another absurd misuse of language that too many editors allow.
Indeed, there is a huge war of language going on, and the Arab side is winning….

We asked him why.

Of course we’re losing. There’s no way we can win. There are just so many more of them….
You have to understand, for example, with The New York Times, they get 10 times as many complaints from the Arab side as they do from the Jewish side…. I’ve spoken to a person who worked on the editorial page of The New York Times… and he said that the op-ed page is unquestionably, clearly anti-Israel. People have done studies on this. It depends on the month, but it’s something like 8-to-1 op-eds are anti-Israel rather than pro, a ridiculous ratio. He also told me, explicitly, that the number of complaints -- and of submissions -- from the Arab side to The New York Times far outstrips the number that come from the pro-Israel side….
He told me how he pushed through a few pro-Israel op-eds, how much of a battle it was just to get them in… how many hoops he had to jump through just to publish one pro op-ed, all the fact-checking he had to do -- things that aren’t done on the other side. The game they sometimes play is that they will allow some of the pro-Israel op-eds in only if they are from such an extremist right-wing side that people can dismiss them….
As far as pure numbers are concerned, there’s no hope of winning. You do what you can, you plug away, and you hope what you’re doing bubbles up to the mainstream consciousness. But it’s very difficult.

It’s difficult but you do it anyway?

Yes. I believe it’s still possible to achieve small victories, so to speak, in the public opinion/public relations point of view…. I’ve seen over the years that things like suicide bombings used to be very popular and the Arabs were very proud of it. But as the Western media showed revulsion at that tactic, it changed how the Arabs thought about it. They were shamed by it. They want to think that a Quranic-based mindset is morally superior to any Western, Judeo-Christian mindset. If the West shows enough revulsion to something they thought was good, they are embarrassed.
That’s the reason you rarely if ever see Hamas openly bragging about suicide bombings nowadays. They saw they were not gaining any respect from the Western press anymore. They were losing the moral high ground by doing so. They don’t want to be looked upon as being less moral than the West….
All these people [in the Western press] who are supposedly the moral arbiters of society should be going out of their way to show revulsion at these terror attacks, but it is something they are not doing these days….
But that’s what I try to do. If Elder of Ziyon writes something that trickles up to the mainstream media, they [the Arab world] will be embarrassed. They won’t necessarily change immediately, and deep down their opinions probably will never change, but embarrassment over the immorality of their cause can sometimes make a difference.

He would know. His scoops have been quoted in CNN, The New York Times, Fox News, Jewish Press, Jerusalem Post, Arutz-7, Algemeiner, Times of Israel and many more. His reporting often ends up making a real difference.
Indeed, as we were gathering information for this article, a posting by Elder of Ziyon in March 2016 about an Arab propaganda map (see Sidebar: “Other Forms of Anti-Israel Bias”) that somehow made it into a 2013 McGraw-Hill textbook triggered a slew of emails to the publisher (including one from Zman), and shortly thereafter the company said that they had stopped selling the book and that all existing inventory would be destroyed, noting that “the map did not meet our academic standards.” It shows that an individual can make a difference.
Given his incredible output, it is even more remarkable to think that “Elder of Ziyon” is a regular working guy with a full-time job and a family. One Jewish newspaper said it very well when it described him as “indefatigable one-man operation, armed only with a computer, chutzpah and stamina.”
He is, indeed, an unbelievable one-man army conducting a mostly solitary but heroic battle in this ongoing war of words -- a war that the media perpetuates in many ways through its ignorance and/or deeply entrenched biases. 




We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.

Last week I went to a library dedication ceremony. Those words sound so normal when I write them but what I attended was something uniquely Israeli.
The ceremony took place in the Reali high-school in Haifa. During the evening my thoughts ranged from the history of the school, the ceremony itself, the library and the threads of education, books and family that tie them all together.
First some background: approximately 4,000 pupils attend the school’s six branches (kindergarten, elementary schools and a high-school). Each branch has a distinctive character, emphasizing different fields: Arts and Sciences, Science, Nature and the Environment or Leadership and Communication.
The school we all call by its abbreviated name “Reali” is actually named “The Hebrew Reali School in Haifa and every word in the name is packed with meaning. The school was founded in 1913. The State of Israel had yet been formally re-established but this did not stop the Jewish community in Palestine from building institutions of education for the next generations.
Yes, there was a thriving Jewish community in Palestine pre-1948 and they were busy building institutions for the future of the Jewish people.
Prior to WW1 it was thought that exact sciences should be taught in German, like in the realschulen in Germany. This was disputed within the Jewish community so, they held an assembly which concluded with the decision to establish the HEBREW Reali School in Haifa. Here all the subjects would be taught in Hebrew.
It would be a school like the German schools but in Haifa, not Europe. Studies would be conducted in the language of the Jewish people, not that of the non-Jews.
This was a revolutionary decision. From then onward, the ancient language would become the language of the future; this school would provide the new leaders of the Nation the opportunity to gain practical knowledge and the skills that would enable them to shape their own destiny and that of their people.
Over the years the Reali led the way in implementing educational initiatives and institutions that were later adopted by Israel’s Ministry of Education, such as the establishment of the scout movement, the “Gadna” (para-military youth preparation program), the “National Service“, the “Personal Commitment Program“, the “term paper” (school thesis), the student council, and the teaching of civics, middle eastern studies and additional subjects.
The Reali has over 22 thousand alumnae who hold key positions in Israeli society, among them are 37 Israel Prize laureates, four IDF Chiefs of General Staff and three Supreme Court Justices. 70 military decorations and medals were given to Reali graduates over the years. Reali alumnae are to be found amongst Israel’s best in science, arts, industry, communications and academia.
Back to the ceremony I attended. The library being dedicated was built in memory of a student who had attended the IDF Junior Command Preparatory School. This unique pre-military boarding school was founded in 1953 with the idea of combining the academic excellence of the Reali school with academic and practical courses in Military and Defense Studies. Graduates would be well rounded individuals, thoroughly prepared to take on leadership roles as combat officers in the IDF.
Students at the boarding school take classes with the students at the regular Reali high-school, the two campuses are adjacent and all are considered part of the “Reali family.”
It is one thing to know that the history of the Reali. It is another to be aware that much of Israel’s elite are alumnae. It is an entirely different world to walk in to a room full of these people. Ex-ministers, IDF commanders, leading business people, media personalities… everywhere I looked I saw faces that I would normally only see on TV. They all know each other and they all came together for this ceremony. Many were friends of the student whose memory was being honored. They had studied with him or served with him in the IDF. Some knew his family. Others didn’t know him but came anyway because he was one of their own, part of their circle.
Menachem “Melmel” Reich was the Lieutenant Commander of the Golani Reconnaissance Unit. He was killed in 1983, during the first Lebanon War. The Golani unit is a family in and of itself, not elitist like the Reali but very tight-knit and proud. In other words, Melmel had the extended members of two “families”, both very important in the construction and preservation of the State of Israel, who came to honor his memory.
How many places, groups or organizations have you come across that tie disconnected individuals together in a bond so tight they can only be described as family? The feeling is difficult to explain to someone who has never experienced it before. Living in Israel has taught me what that looks like.
Melmel was 22 years old when he died. 33 years after his death he still looms large in the memory of his friends. The fact that so many busy people made time to come to the event is a testament to the impression he left on them. It was one of his friends who funded the library that was built in his honor saying: “Melmel always said to me that he wants to live on the Carmel and have his children go to the Reali. He didn’t have a chance to have children. That’s why I want to enrich the tradition of studying at the Reali for other children. That’s why a library seemed an appropriate way to honor him.”
And what a beautiful library! The existing school library was expanded and completely renewed. It’s bright and inviting, well organized, with dedicated areas for computers, private study and even rooms in which meetings or brainstorming sessions can be held without bothering anyone else.
This might sound like a library dedication that could have happened anywhere else. Someone with enough money to invest can pay to build whatever they want in honor of their friends and any school would be happy to receive such a donation.
True. And yet, as I walked around the library, I was struck by the elements that are uniquely Israeli.
In the entrance of the library there is a wall with the names of the Reali students who were killed in Israel’s wars and by acts of terrorism. The memorial wall is covered in a shocking number of names, especially considering that these were all part of a small circle – friends of current students and teachers, their parents and grandparents. Each individual is a world to their family and friends and here, everyone knows everyone.
Standing in front of the wall, suddenly it was not the number of names that struck me, not the names of the people I know who jumped out at me… it was the empty space. The space left for new names. The terrible realization that there will be the need for more space. Eventually more names will have to be added. More will be killed in future wars and terror attacks.
How many students do you know who walk around with the realization that maybe, one day, their name will be added to a memorial wall?

Inside the library there is a section filled with blue books about every single student whose name is on the memorial wall. Anyone can read their story, learn about each individual. Books seem an appropriate way to honor the deceased. A very Jewish way to preserve their memory.
The elements created to honor the memory of the deceased are not something separate, they are part of the whole - given their own special space but not pushed aside.
The children walk past these areas when searching for books or doing their homework in the library. The books about the deceased can be used for research, for school projects. The people discussed are their brothers, their cousins, their uncles… One day it could be their name on the wall, their details in a book and if not theirs – those of their friends and family.

And then there was this: a modest rack displaying a selection of student theses. Behind it, shelves filled with more theses. Where the other displays were memories of the past, here was a glimpse in to the future.
It would be difficult to differentiate between these high-school projects and the theses of university students. Much of the subject matter is way over my head. The title of the project with the blue cover is “Measurement of the universe expansion characteristics by redshifts calculation of emission lines in active galactical nuclei”. Do you know what that means? I don’t.
On the shelf below is a project delving in to the Hamas Charter as it is actually applied. To the left is a project on cultural defense in criminal law. Next to that a project on the intervention of God in war (as described in the bible). Physics, biology, law, history, culture, Middle Eastern studies... these are the fruits of our frivolous 17 year olds…
I went to a library dedication ceremony. Something very normal that couldn’t have happened quite that way anywhere else in the world.
I worry about the future of our nation, of our country. All Israelis do. What I saw at the library dedication ceremony made me think that maybe things aren’t so bad. The Jewish people are called the People of the Book. It is that one book that taught us to love and cherish all books, to emphasize study and keeping the mind sharp. We are the People of THE Book and a people of books.
I think that as long as we still have books we will be ok. Books and family.



We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
From Ian:

Alan M. Dershowitz: Obama: Don't Destroy the Peace Process by Turning it Over to the U.N.
Obama must realize that no lasting peace can be achieved in the remaining months of his presidency: there are a multitude of complex and contentious issues — most notably the status of Jerusalem, the rights of so-called Palestinian refugees, and the situation in Gaza — that must be thoroughly addressed in order to achieve a lasting peace. Our next president will undoubtedly have to wade into the Israeli-Palestinian peace process again. The new administration — with the agreement of the Senate — should have full latitude to do what it deems most appropriate. It should not be stuck with parameters bequeathed to it by a President desperate to secure a short-term foreign policy "victory" that in the long term will make a resolution of the conflict more difficult to achieve.
If Obama feels that he must intrude in an effort to break the logjam before he leaves office, he should suggest that the current Israeli government offer proposals similar to those offered in 2000- 2001 and 2008 and that this time the Palestinian leadership should accept them in face-to face negotiations. But he should take no action (or inaction) that invites U.N. involvement in the peace process — involvement that would guarantee failure for any future president's efforts to encourage a negotiated peace.
We should hear the views of both candidates on whether the U.S. should support or veto a Security Council resolution that would tie their hands were they to be elected president. It is not too late to stop President Obama from destroying any realistic prospects for peace.

Vic Rosenthal: How not to stabilize the Middle East
My very first blog post almost exactly 10 years ago was about the just-released Iraq Study Group Report, co-authored by Lee Hamilton and James Baker. What struck me about it was how it asserted that the way to solve the problems of the Middle East in general and the impasse facing the US in Iraq in particular was to achieve a “comprehensive Arab-Israeli peace on all fronts,” by direct American involvement. It seemed to me a thunderous non-sequitur. What did Israel have to do with the ambitions of the various players in Iraq?
The commission recommended that the US “engage” with Syria and Iran, who were arming and encouraging the insurgencies that were killing Iraqis and Americans. The US, it said, should use carrots as well as sticks to persuade them to stop trying to destabilize Iraq and instead become part of an international “support group” for that suffering country. And one of the major carrots was Israel.
Syria was key to the plan. Baker and Hamilton (and their then little-known associate Ben Rhodes, now a top Obama advisor) believed that if Israel would cede the Golan Heights to Syria, Syria would cooperate in enforcing the toothless UNSC resolution 1701, which called for an end to arming Hezbollah, with which Israel had just fought a vicious little war. Syria could also be convinced, they said, to stop trying to subvert the government of Lebanon, whose officials – including President Rafik Hariri – it had been systematically murdering. Syria would also help convince Hamas to recognize Israel’s right to exist (!) and to unite with the Palestinian Authority, which would rule a unified ‘Palestine’ in Judea, Samaria and Gaza. At long last, the Israeli-Arab conflict would be over, and at the same time the grateful Arabs and Iranians would allow the US to exit Iraq with honor.
The plan failed to take into account several things, including Israel’s instinct for self-preservation, Palestinian rejectionism, Iranian expansionism, the rise of Da’esh, the increased insecurity of the conservative Sunni nations over Iran’s nuclear program, the implosion of Syria, and Russia’s aggressive move into the region.
Nevertheless, the Barack Obama Administration adopted a modified version of the plan.
Caroline Glick: Netanyahu’s critical foreign tour
This then brings us to Netanyahu’s upcoming trips. Each state that he will visit has something to offer Israel in expanding its intelligence, cyberwarfare and economic capabilities. Australia, a major Western economy, is moving toward China as America has become less engaged in the Pacific. Israel has an acute interest in using Australia as a platform for expanding its ties to China and other Asian countries, both because of the economic advantages such ties convey and due to China’s strategic importance to Russia.
As for Singapore, Israel effectively built the Singaporean military in the 1960s and 1970s. The country remains extremely supportive of Israel. Like Australia, Singapore has close ties to China.
It has technological and other capabilities that can be extremely advantageous for Israel today.
Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan are critically important to Israel today. Their strategic proximity to Iran, and their ties to Russia, along with their ethnic composition and their natural resources make securing good relations with both critical to Israel’s ability to advance and security its strategic interests in every sphere.
Israel has tremendous assets to offer each of the four countries that Netanyahu will visit. These assets must be deployed wisely to ensure that Israel gains as much as possible from his trip and from its future ties with all of them.
Given the dramatic changes in the global power balance, and their implications for Israel, Netanyahu’s decision to fly to visit these four countries just after the US elections tells us that he gets it. At a time of regional and global turbulence and uncertainty, in the context of swiftly multiplying threats, this is no small matter. (h/t Elder of Lobby)

  • Tuesday, November 01, 2016
  • Elder of Ziyon
South Africa's Voice of the Cape reported in March:

After years of setbacks, it seems a decade long dream to bring the first Palestinian museum on African soil to life may soon come to fruition. The final phase of completion of the eight storey Human Rights Centre and the Palestinian Museum is under way. Founder of the Kaaf Trust Dr. Anwah Nagia said now is the time to bring Cape Town and the world the first Palestinian museum and to bring South Africa the first human rights centre.

The centre will endeavour to bring South Africans a discourse on forced removals that have occurred and continue to occur around the world, as well as other socio-political issues that face communities.

Nagia explained that the face of the building is “keeping with a period theme” and represents all of humanity. The building will be known as the Al-Kaaf human rights centre – “the cave of knowledge.”

Two floors of the museum are dedicated to the Palestine prior to occupation; the; 14th, 15th and 16th century.

Visitors will also be presented a more contemporary discourse, inclusive of; the Belfour Declaration [sic], the Nakbah, the 1967 war, and the first, second and third intifada.

“In 1948 the United Nations declared the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was formed as a prerequisite for the United Nations, the same year that the United Nations allowed [Zionism] and [Apartheid] South Africa to be born – the same period where almost nine million Palestinians lost 87 per cent of their land, many of whom remain in exile scattered around the world.”

The first floor will showcase the consequences of the occupation; the 8,500 prisoners, the imprisonment of 2,500 children under 16, torture, rape, and destroyed land, inclusive of the blockade of the Gaza Strip.
Nine million refugees in 1948? Rape? 2500 children in prison? The truth is obviously not a priority for this museum. (But by saying that it includes information on the "third intifada" this "human rights museum" clearly supports terrorism against Jews.)

It is even worse, though. While the museum is being presented as a "human rights centre" to the English speaking world, in Arabic the work in progress is being called the "Palestinian Holocaust Museum."  (The logo merely says "Palestine Museum" but the news stories about it all call it, explicitly, the "Palestinian Holocaust Museum" - " "متحف الهولوكست الفلسطيني".)

The name is deliberate, as the planned museum is less than two kilometers from the Cape Town Holocaust Centre (which requires visitors to show ID to help foil terror attacks.)

The "Palestine Museum" itself does not yet exist. Its webpage doesn't exist, Its Twitter account and Facebook account have not been updated since 2012. The articles appear to be more to get fundraising than to show any real progress, as far as can be seen.

Arabic articles about the museum include Pallywood photos of the "Palestinian Holocaust." For example. Hamrin News illustrates its article on the museum with this picture:


This is actually a photo of a massacre in Algeria in 1945.

Palestinian site Safa illustrates its article about the museum this way:


This is a photo of the dead at Tel al-Zaatar, Lebanon, killed during the battles between the PLO and Christian Lebanese militia in 1976.

The entire museum is planned as a series of outright lies, and the publicity for it adds to them to create the impression that Palestinian suffering equals or surpasses Jewish suffering.

But don't call them antisemitic. The museum plans to include a small synagogue as well as a small Christian chapel, neither of which will ever be used except to show visitors how tolerant the Museum of Palestinian Lies is.




We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
  • Tuesday, November 01, 2016
  • Elder of Ziyon



There are at least 20 Arabic websites that are condemning a new cafe in Jerusalem that provides free drinks for Israeli soldiers.

The preacher of Al - Aqsa Mosque and head of the Supreme Islamic Council , Dr. Ikrima Sabri, described the cafe "dangerous," saying, "the occupation isolates the mosque and worshipers using various ways and means, and they are opening a cafe for soldiers near the gates of Al-Aqsa mosque in order to provoke the feelings of the worshipers, these actions increase the tension in the place. "  Other articles say that it adds gasoline on the fire of the tensions in Jerusalem.

Many of the articles specifically mention the horror of the Jews placing a "Talmudic Mezuzah" on the doorway of the cafe.

What is the real story?

The shop is located at the exact location where, one year ago, a Palestinian terrorist murdered 22 year old Aharon Benita and stabbed his wife and baby. Rabbi Nehamia Lavi heard the screams of Mrs. Banita and went to investigate and was stabbed to death as well.

The Jewish youth of the Old City raised 50,000 shekels to renovate a store in order to show appreciation to Israeli soldiers who put their lives on the line to protect them.

For a year, the youths of the Old City have been distributing cakes and soft drinks to soldiers who patrol the area and they decided to expand the enterprise.

This is a highly appropriate reaction to a terror attack: to show appreciation to those who endanger their lives and to show that such attacks will not succeed in scaring the residents to flee. On the contrary, they create incentive for them to stay.

Every terror attack should result in simlar concrete actions to make it clear that terror will not only not succeed, but will backfire.

Those who use these attacks as excuses to push another Judenfrei area are the ones who are ensuring that such attacks will increase.

Making statements like this is the only way to reach real peace.





We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
Many of t
  • Tuesday, November 01, 2016
  • Elder of Ziyon

The New York Times wrote about a wannabe suicide bomber who is now purportedly dedicated to "peace."

She knew that once she put on the explosive belt, there would be no turning back. She knew it would rip her limb from limb, reducing her to a bloody pulp. She knew it would leave her only daughter an orphan.

But she also knew this: It would kill Israelis. With luck, a lot of them. And that was reason enough to do it.

Shifa al-Qudsi was a suicide bomber, or at least tried to be. A Palestinian hairdresser driven to anger, despair and hopelessness, she volunteered to carry out an attack on Israelis that would strike a blow, she thought, for her beleaguered people. “I wanted to seek revenge,” she said.

But she was arrested before she could act and today, after six years in an Israeli prison, Ms. Qudsi has transformed herself from a would-be deliverer of death into a messenger of peace. Now working with a group that brings Palestinians and Israelis together to advocate an end to the conflict between their peoples, she tries to channel the rage that took her to the brink into a nonviolent movement for change.

...“I don’t feel bad that I made that decision,” she said of her brush with death. “But now I reject suicide attacks. God decides when we will live and when we will die. Now my jihad is to send out a message to the world. The world must know the Palestinians’ land is occupied. We are people who want peace, just peace.
She wants peace? Great! So do I! But what is her definition of peace?

We find out when she answers critics from the Arab side that she is guilty of "normalization:"
If viewed warily by the Israeli authorities, Ms. Qudsi is not accepted by everyone at home either. Palestinian attackers are celebrated in the West Bank as martyrs, and their families receive compensation from the Palestinian Authority. Cooperation with Israelis, even like-minded ones, is often deemed betrayal.

“The Palestinian people have lost hope and don’t believe that peace with the Israelis will ever be achieved,” said Mahmoud Mubarak, president of the Jalazoun refugee camp council. “Many Palestinians consider the participation in joint projects with Israelis as normalization.”

Normalization refers to making the current situation better rather than seeking to overturn it altogether.
No, that is not what normalization means. The specific BDS definition of normalization is "[the] means to participate in any project or initiative or activity, local or international, specifically designed for gathering (either directly or indirectly) Palestinians (and/or Arabs) and Israelis, whether individuals or institutions; that does not explicitly aim to expose and resist the occupation and all forms of discrimination and oppression against the Palestinian people.”

In other words, any activity that treats Israeli Jews as anything other than evil is forbidden as "normalization."

Omar Barghouti, a founder of the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, called B.D.S., which targets Israel internationally, said the ostensible neutrality of groups like Combatants for Peace actually cemented the occupation.

“Joining normalization groups like Combatants for Peace is certainly not the answer; it aggravates the problem,” he added. “Normalizing Israeli apartheid only entrenches it.”

In an interview in a cafe one morning this fall, Ms. Qudsi denied enabling the occupation. “I’m against normalization. We are all against normalization, even this group,” she said. “There’s a huge difference.”
So Ms. Qudsi's insistence that she, and Palestinians altogether, want "peace" is an obvious lie. She says that even Combatants for Peace is against normalization, agreeing that Israel is uniquely evil and Israelis must be shunned unless they spend 100% of their time supporting Palestinians who consider talking to normal Israelis as forbidden.

When Israelis talk peace, they mean that they want a comprehensive, real peace where both sides can become friendly and work together. When Palestinians like Qudsi says she wants peace, she means a world where Jews have no political power and no rights as a people.

It is a bit of a difference.

But the New York Times cannot seem to grasp that fundamental difference of definitions as they call Qudsi, without qualification, a "messenger of peace."



We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.

AddToAny

EoZ Book:"Protocols: Exposing Modern Antisemitism"

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Hasbys!

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For over 19 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

subscribe via email

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Blog Archive