In December, Israel agreed to a plan with Cyprus to allow aid to come to Gaza by sea. Ships would be inspected in Larnaca and then go to Gaza - a plan strikingly similar to the US and World Central Kitchen initiatives.
Tuesday, March 19, 2024
- Tuesday, March 19, 2024
- Elder of Ziyon
In December, Israel agreed to a plan with Cyprus to allow aid to come to Gaza by sea. Ships would be inspected in Larnaca and then go to Gaza - a plan strikingly similar to the US and World Central Kitchen initiatives.
Monday, March 18, 2024
Bari Weiss: ‘History has come for Israel, it’s come for Ukraine and it will come for the West next’
Weiss is known for her coverage of anti-Semitism in America, and calling out its manifestations is one of the things she’s best known for. Her first book, How to Fight Anti-Semitism, published in 2019, was spurred by the Tree of Life synagogue shooting in Pittsburgh the previous year. But when we met in New York in 2021, long before the Hamas massacre of October 7, Weiss had told me that, as an American Jew, she’d always felt she could hold her head up high, in contrast to those of us in the Old World. “I had an arrogance, a sense that, you know, anti-Semitism was for Jews of other times, certainly, but also other places. And I remember reading about things that would happen, and places, especially like France, and thinking that could never happen here. I have been disabused of that idea.”Fury over ‘sickening’ LRB article saying Israel leverages Shoah to ‘slaughter children’
The America that has roiled and reared up since Trump, since the Black Lives Matter movement swept over, and since October 7, has illuminated a new reality for Jews in the US. Weiss explains: “When we’re free, when freedom and liberty thrive, Jews thrive. Because, by their very existence, Jews represent the freedom to think differently, the freedom to believe differently, the freedom to raise their families differently. What we’re seeing now is a turn against freedom. In the grand sense, there’s the turn against the idea, even of the free world and [there’s this] kind of moral equivalency, whether it’s from the Leftists who glorify Hamas, or Rightists like Tucker Carlson [who] glorify tyrants like Putin.
“It’s also coming internally from… elite culture here in the States. I’m sure it’s the same in the UK, where the ability to discern between free and unfree, good and bad, and better and worse, seems to have been erased. The fact that there are whole realms of American life where in order to succeed you kind of need to tamp down or hide your Jewishness is a sign of that.”
Weiss went on a trip to Israel in January with young producers from the Free Press. As well as having drinks with Douglas Murray, she interviewed Lucy Aharish, Israel’s first Muslim-Arab presenter, married to Fauda star Tzachi Halevy, who is Jewish, and held an event in Jaffa with Natan Sharansky, the human-rights activist and former Soviet prisoner, to whom Alexei Navalny began writing in prison. I ask her what she’d like to happen in Israel in the medium term, but she scoffs at the question, because she feels it’s none of her business.
“The thing that really struck me [about the Israel trip] was the clarity, on the right and left, like, we know what we’re fighting for. We know what’s at stake. We know how thin the fence is that separates civilisation from barbarism. And I think if you ask most Americans, even many plugged-in Americans, a question like, ‘Would you fight for America? What are you willing to die for?’ I don’t even think they would have the capacity.
“Many people, especially many of our elites, well, there’s no sense of duty and responsibility. Leaving Israel [was] walking back into a society that I don’t think has fully recognised the history that has come for Israel and has come for Ukraine, and maybe will soon come from Taiwan, will come for us. How can you even conceive of war if you don’t even understand what it is that people are willing to fight and die for? And what are you willing to fight and die for?” Weiss’s coverage of October 7 in the Free Press has largely reflected her stance of staunch support for Israel’s response and the moral importance of its fight for survival, especially in the face of global condemnation.
For well-to-do Jews, Mishra argues, the Holocaust and an affiliation to the Jewish State, “turned into a badge of identity and moral rectitude”.Jonathan Glazer’s Oscars speech condemned by Son of Saul director: ‘He should have stayed silent’
Now the essayist argues that “Gaza has become for countless powerless people the essential condition of political and ethical consciousness in the 21st century [...] it seems that only those jolted into consciousness by the calamity of Gaza can rescue the Shoah from Netanyahu, Biden, Scholz and Sunak."
Mishra goes on: “Many of the protesters who fill the streets of their cities week after week have no immediate relation to the European past of the Shoah. They judge Israel by its actions in Gaza rather than its Shoah-sanctified demand for total and permanent security.”
The piece has drawn widespread derision from Jewish figures. Writing in The Times, JC columnist, Hadley Freedman, noted “the left-wing intelligentsia only tries this kind of provocative thought experiment with Jews”. The JC’s Anshel Pfeffer tweeted, “There [are] plenty of ways of criticising Israel over the war in Gaza but writing 8000 words lecturing Jews that they are like Nazis and anyway the Holocaust actually wasn’t so special so they should stop obsessing about it says more about this pseud than it does about Israelis or Jews.”
Israeli government spokesman Eylon Levy, wrote that the essay demonstrated the major challenge of “Holocaust inversion, especially when turned against Jews in conjunction with sickening blood libels.”
Political correspondent, Lahav Harkov, called the article “disgusting”, and said the writer’s use of “the concept of the Holocaust as a ‘universal reference point’ is part of the problem [...] It led to the idea that the Holocaust was not unique, and was also some kind of purifying experience from which Jews were ennobled and therefore supposed to behave a certain way”.
The argument over the LRB front page is the latest in a history of controversy between the journal and the Jewish state.
On 18 October, LRB published a letter signed by hundreds of writers which condemned Israel but failed to mention the October 7 massacre. The letter claimed, “The State of Israel commits serious crimes against humanity” and accused Israel of “genocide”.
The Hebrew Writers Association in Israel, representing 800 writers and artists, wrote a public letter condemning LRB for their initial response to the war. The group then denounced LRB when they failed to respond to their letter.
László Nemes, the director of acclaimed film Son of Saul, has criticised The Zone of Interest director Jonathan Glazer’s Oscars acceptance speech.This is how Hamas used Gazan journalists for the Oct. 7 massacre
Speaking at the ceremony on Sunday, Glazer said he and his producer, James Wilson, “stand here as men who refute their Jewishness and the Holocaust being hijacked by an occupation which has led to conflict for so many innocent people, whether the victims of October 7 in Israel or the ongoing attack on Gaza.”
Glazer’s words have met with both applause and opprobrium, including from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), who on Monday called them “morally reprehensible”.
The ADL posted on social media: “Israel is not hijacking Judaism or the Holocaust by defending itself against genocidal terrorists. Glazer’s comments at the #Oscars are both factually incorrect & morally reprehensible. They minimise the Shoah & excuse terrorism of the most heinous kind.”
This sentiment was echoed by Nemes, who – like Glazer – won the foreign language Oscar for a film about the Holocaust; in Nemes’ case his 2015 movie Son of Saul, about a Jewish prisoner forced to work in the gas chambers at Auschwitz. US Holocaust survivors’ foundation calls Jonathan Glazer’s Oscars speech ‘morally indefensible’
“The Zone of Interest is an important movie,” Nemes writes. “It is not made in a usual way. It questions the grammar of cinema. Its director should have stayed silent instead of revealing he has no understanding of history and the forces undoing civilisation, before or after the Holocaust.
“Had he embraced the responsibility that comes with a film like that, he would not have resorted to talking points disseminated by propaganda meant to eradicate, at the end, all Jewish presence from the Earth.”
PEOPLE WHO HATE Jews can be journalists, but they should not be reporting about the Jewish state. Therefore, Reuters is wrong to continue paying for pictures from photojournalist Doaa Rouqa, whose social media posts, revealed by HonestReporting, have celebrated rockets fired at Israel and called Hamas’s attacks “brave resistance.” Last week, HonestReporting also revealed a disturbing social media post by Reuters Executive Editor Simon Robinson, who shared an extremely problematic essay titled “The Shoah after Gaza.”
There is also plenty of evidence of journalists collaborating with Hamas that did not come through HonestReporting.
The IDF revealed evidence that two Al Jazeera journalists were active terrorists in Hamas. Mohammed Wishnah held a senior role in the terrorist group’s anti-tank unit and taught young jihadis how to fire anti-tank missiles and make incendiary devices. Ismail Abu Omar was found to have accompanied Hamas terrorists into Israel on Oct. 7, going to Kibbutz Nir Oz.
Gaza-based journalist Muthana Al-Najjar entered Israel on Oct. 7 and shocked Israelis with his stand-up to camera reports from Kibbutz Nahal Oz as gunshots were heard in the background. He did not wear a press vest or a helmet to make him identifiable as a member of the press, and clearly did not feel under threat from the Hamas terrorists in his midst.
Al-Najjar filmed the kidnapping of terrified Shiri Bibas and her small children, Ariel and Kfir, instead of trying to save their lives. He also shared a picture showing two of the terrorists triumphantly stepping on the body of a murdered Israeli, with a comment translated from Arabic: “Their dead under the feet of the warriors of al-Qassam Brigades.”
While Al-Najjar actively knew he was part of a Hamas plan, others listed here might not have. But the line in the Hamas document that Dayan revealed says clearly that the terrorist organization intended to take advantage of journalists, and on Oct. 7 it did just that.
After HonestReporting asked questions about the Gazan photojournalists, reporters from media outlets that we put on the defensive interviewed me and asked what evidence we had. When I honestly – and perhaps foolishly – replied that we had merely raised questions and did not claim to have answers, I was attacked personally and falsely portrayed as if I had backtracked and undermined my organization’s report.
Ilana Dayan’s report and the others mentioned here answer the questions and validate the work that HonestReporting is doing as a media watchdog. We asked legitimate questions, and now the answers are out there.
- Monday, March 18, 2024
- Elder of Ziyon
The Israel Defense Forces early Monday morning launched a raid on Gaza City’s Shifa Hospital, amid intelligence that senior Hamas officials were in the area and using the hospital to plan and carry out terror activity, the military said.During the operation troops killed a senior Hamas commander, according to the IDF.In one incident, the IDF said troops killed a senior Hamas commander, Faiq Mabhouh.Mabhouh, who served as the head of operations in Hamas’s internal security, was armed and hiding inside the Shifa complex, “from which he was working to advance terror activity,” the IDF said.Mabhouh was killed amid an exchange of fire during an attempt to arrest him, the IDF said. In a nearby room, the IDF said troops recovered a cache of weapons.Mabhouh, according to the IDF and Shin Bet, was responsible for the “synchronization” of various Hamas units in the Gaza Strip, including during the war.The slain operative was the brother of senior Hamas official Mahmoud Mabhouh, who was allegedly assassinated by the Mossad in Dubai in 2010, Israeli defense sources confirmed to The Times of Israel. Mahmoud Mabhouh was chief of logistics and weapons procurement for the military wing of Hamas.
But Hamas says he was an innocent police chief who was only doing humanitarian work:
The government media office in Gaza confirmed that the occupation had assassinated Brigadier General Fayeq Al-Mabhouh, who was coordinating with the tribes and UNRWA to bring and secure humanitarian aid to northern Gaza.
The media office said in a statement that Brigadier General Al-Mabhouh was carrying out purely humanitarian civilian work, and he should have been protected and not harmed in accordance with international law.
He added, "The occupation committing such crimes, killing civilians, and targeting those in charge of humanitarian work confirms that it seeks with all force to spread chaos and chaos in the Gaza Strip, and prevent facilitating the access of humanitarian aid to hundreds of thousands of hungry people."
He said that the assassination indicates that the occupation is determined to starve and deprive the population of access to food supplies, despite their limited availability so far.
An email correspondent has sent me the legal justification for the IDF targeting the Hamas policemen, from Yoram Dinstein's "The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict," where he writes:Can police officers and other law enforcement agents be subsumed under the heading of armed forces (who are legitimately subject to attack)? The answer to the question depends on whether the policemen have officially incorporated into the armed forces or (despite the absence of official incorporation) have taken part in hostilities. If integrated into the armed forces, policemen - like all combatants - 'may be attacked at any time simply because they have that particular status'.My correspondent asked Dinstein in an email1) In the case of Hamas police would it be enough to constitute that all police could be targeted? and 2) where is the line of 'taking part in hostilities'?"to which Dinstein replied1. In a non-State entity the difference between police and other armed groups is hardly perceptible. This is true not only of Hamas. In the Palestinian Authority, the "police" is the army.
2. In any event, direct participation in hostilities (the alternative) includes also training prior to combat engagement.
- (email Dated: 27/01/2009)
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon! Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. Read all about it here! |
|
- Monday, March 18, 2024
- Elder of Ziyon
- Forest Rain, Opinion
By Forest Rain
Have you ever seen the essential oil in a mandarin burst into the air when you peel it? Taken a deep breath, filling your lungs with the clean smell of citrus fruit, fresh and ripe, asking to be picked off the tree?Last week I went to Be’eri to help the farmers pick their
oranges and mandarins. The groves are straight, clean, and lush, full of fruit
more delicious than any other I’ve tasted.
Two months after my first visit to Be’eri following the
Hamas massacre, I still find myself reluctant to write about Be’eri. I’d rather
write about their oranges.
It was January when I went for the first time, three months
after October 7th. I thought I was ready to visit Be’eri.
I had already been to Nir Oz and Nirim, seen the
destruction, and heard survivors speak of their murdered neighbors, those taken
hostage, and what had happened to their families on October 7th. As
terrible as their stories were, I knew that what had happened in Be’eri was
worse.
The Hamas massacre was so horrific that most of what
happened was not shown on Israeli TV, to not traumatize the public. Numerous
survivors refused to describe what they saw in detail because the details were
too horrible.
We all saw the staggering stream of bodies being carried out
of Kibbutz Be’eri. That image was deemed to be “clean” enough for the media to
air. 97 people were murdered from a community of around 1200.
I didn’t see the Hamas livestream of their slaughter. I saw
the videos and heard the testimonies of the rescue workers who desperately
searched for the living and discovered people who had been tortured, raped, and
burned to death.
I knew what had happened and thought I was ready to see
Be’eri. I wasn’t.
My friend Eva Hetzroni lived in
Be’eri, (2.5 miles/4 kilometers from Gaza). When Gazans rioted near the fence,
burning tires (riots we now know were covers for practicing how to invade
Israel), Eva told me of the air being drenched in smoke and having difficulty
breathing. Helplessly I would apologize and sometimes afterwards I would cry
that my friend was suffering from the hate of her neighbors.
No one prepared for the hate that would boil through the
fence and incinerate everything in its path…
When things were peaceful, Eva would tell me about her
husband Avia and her beloved twin grandchildren Liel and Yannai.
Eva passed away some months before the war. It took me a few
weeks to gather up the courage to check what had happened to her family. The
lists of the murdered and the hostages from Be’eri were so long… Avia was
murdered. Yannai was murdered. Liel was murdered. Their great-aunt Ayala,
“Aylush” (who was raising them because their mother had become disabled during
childbirth) was also murdered. The twin’s mother, Shira, and her caregiver
survived.
The front door of Avia’s house was still marked with Zaka’s
sticker indicating that they had checked the house. There was also a piece of
tape where someone had written his name: Avia Hetzroni, HYD (the abbreviation
for May God avenge his blood).
Avia was a senior emergency medical technician and ambulance
driver for Magen David Adom. Everyone knew him.
He was one of those people that made others feel confident and safe.
People turned to him for help because he always seemed to know what to do, and
he did it with a gracious and generous spirit.
I braced myself before walking into the place where this
capable man was murdered. It seems he was in the “safe room” when the monsters
came. Although the house had been cleaned, the bullet holes remained, telling
the story of what had happened.
Bullet holes in the security glass of the safe room/ (made to protect people
from missile shrapnel, not terrorists shooting in through the glass).
Bullet holes through the outside of the safe room door.
Bullet holes in the wall across from the door.
I was told Avia crawled, dragging himself wounded, from the
safe room towards the kitchen. That image flashed through my mind before I
could erase it. The room I was standing in didn’t have streaks of blood on the
floor. Not anymore. Others had to deal with the reality of that horror.
Walking towards the house where Liel and Yannai lived with
their aunt Ayala, I was struck by the beauty of Be’eri. The homes are
comfortable and solid, structures that speak of easy living and
permanence.
Other kibbutzim, as lovely as they may be, are different.
The houses are often very simple, structures designed to be put up fast and
provide sufficient shelter. After all, what do people need in a place where
they spend much of their time outside and never lock their doors? The contrast
between the lovely communities and the destruction wrecked on them is
gut-wrenching. Of all the places I witnessed, the dichotomy is most harsh in
Be’eri.
Heavy-hearted, I knew I was going to see the place where Liel
and Yannai were murdered. I thought I was ready. Turning the corner, I felt
like I walked into an invisible brick wall.
My eyes understood what they were seeing. My brain gasped,
grasping for enough oxygen to process what was in front of me.
This wasn’t a terror attack. It
wasn’t a battle. This was a war. Inside our borders, inside our homes.
I’ve never found it so hard to put one foot in front of the
other. To go see, from close.
The smashed homes, riddled with bullets and charred by smoke
don’t begin to tell the stories of the monsters who swarmed here destroying
everything in their path and laughing with joy. They tortured children in front
of their parents and parents in front of their children. They mutilated, raped,
and burned alive entire families.
And they did it for hours and hours on end.
I walked through destruction that told the story of the war
that happened when the army finally arrived. Late and too few they came - not
as they should have, an organized army ready for battle, but as individual
warriors, heroes willing to sacrifice themselves to save others. They succeeded
in pulling some out of the hell they were in. Other times, they failed.
They didn’t succeed in saving Liel and Yannai or their aunt
Ayala. I was hesitant to walk into their home and did so with reverence, trying
to imagine what they experienced.
Liel’s room had a blue wall with a decorative metal piece
that looked like butterflies or leaves. The house, with things flung
everywhere, looked like a hurricane had blown through it. The monsters barged
in and dragged them to the neighbor’s home where they and others were held
hostage for hours. Rage welled inside me to see that the monsters spray-painted
the walls with writing declaring Allah’s supremacy and crediting their unit for
what they had done to my friend’s family.
They had so much time on their hands that they could “sign”
their work.
Swallowing my rage made my head hurt. I thought I was going
to lose it when leaving the house, my feet crunched on beads strewn across the
floor. Liel’s beads? Was it a piece of jewelry she loved or beads for
handicrafts that she wanted to do? I don’t know. I only know that she should be
alive and isn’t.
I would rather write about the oranges of Be’eri. Or their
extraordinary printing business. I don’t want to write about the horror or the
feeling of being violently violated.
Perhaps people who have experienced rape or had their home
broken into can understand what it means to have your sanctuary, your home,
your body, broken into and ripped apart in a way that makes it clear that what
you thought was yours isn’t in your control. The violation that cannot be
healed. The burden of knowing what happened which must be carried forever. The
breaking of the spirit when you discover that you imagined yourself to be safe
but it was a fantasy, not reality.
It’s not something you want to talk about. It’s not
something you want to even admit to out loud. But we must. Otherwise, how will
we live?
The people of Be’eri, like the people of Israel, are strong.
Broken, yet still standing, we put one foot in front of the other and do what
we must. There are houses to rebuild, although it will take a long time and
enormous effort before they can again become homes. The printing house is
working.
There are oranges to be picked.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon! Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. Read all about it here! |
|
U.S. Fails to Understand What This War Means to Israel
President Biden's standing by Israel at the start of the war with Hamas will be remembered as one of the high points in the special relationship between the countries. But this has been blunted by the passage of time and the images from Gaza.WSJ Editorial: A "Revitalized" Palestinian Authority?
Biden's demand to increase humanitarian aid and related initiatives (airdrops, maritime pier) show that his administration has not internalized that the problem is not delivering aid to Gaza, but its distribution within it. Hamas will take control of everything that enters. It will use it to supply its fighters (and prolong their ability to fight) and strengthen its rule. The way to prevent this is to deliver the aid to areas where Hamas would not be able to access it.
The U.S. discounts the extent of public support for Hamas in Gaza, and the fact that it is entrenched in all spheres of life. The administration holds an optimistic assessment regarding the ability to bring about deep change through governmental models under Arab or international auspices.
America's vision includes peace agreements between Israel and Saudi Arabia and the establishment of a Palestinian state. But from Israel's perspective, normalization with Saudi Arabia will not compensate for Hamas' non-defeat. Talk of a "Palestinian state" after the Oct. 7 massacre constitutes a prize for Hamas and expresses a lack of understanding of the sentiment in the Israeli public. Anyone who thinks that after Oct. 7 Israel will take risks like those taken in the past lives in a fantasy land.
The Biden administration has not internalized that for Israel, the defeat of Hamas is an existential issue. It is not like America's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which were conducted thousands of miles away. Israel's deterrence that collapsed on Oct. 7 will not be restored if Israel stops short of meeting the goals it has defined for the war. The temptation for players in our region to attack it will grow.
The Biden Administration is pitching its "two-state solution" to Israel with the lure of a "revitalized" Palestinian Authority. However, a new report by Regavim, an Israeli NGO, reveals a pattern of Palestinian police "turning their Western-supplied guns on the State of Israel" and then being glorified for their terrorism by the PA.Arsen Ostrovsky: Hamas are cruelly turning hospitals into targets
It specifically identifies 76 officers of the Palestinian Authority Security Forces (PASF) who have been killed or arrested while carrying out terrorist attacks against Israelis in the past three years. The latest example is Capt. Muhammad Manasrah, who shot up a gas station on Feb. 29, murdering two Israelis.
The PASF was created to fight Hamas terrorism in collaboration with Israel, but for too long it has abetted, committed or celebrated terrorism. A serious reform would begin by axing the PA's "pay-for-slay" program, which pays terrorists in prison as well as families of "martyrs," such as the Oct. 7 killers. A reformed PA would also cut the incitement to hatred against Jews from its media, sermons and schools.
The two-state solution is one of those diplomatic constructs that sounds nice but crashes against reality. In this case it's the reality that today's Palestinian leaders don't want Israel to exist.
In principle, each of these hospitals, which Hamas has totally usurped for purposes of shielding their fighters and weapons, and using them as control and command centers, lose their protected status under international law and become legitimate military targets.
Article 8(2) of the Rome Statute and Article 52(2) of the First Protocol to the Geneva Convention of 1949 both make clear that intentionally directing attacks against hospitals and medical locations, can only be permissible, provided there is a distinct military objective.
In this case, the military objective is clear and defined: to eliminate the threat of Hamas, which continues to use hospitals and other civilian areas in Gaza to plan and execute acts of terror against Israel, as well as rescue the 239 hostages that the terror group is holding captive.
However, merely because Hamas has seized hospitals as their own personal launching pads, does not give Israel carte blanche to automatically attack.
International humanitarian law also dictates that, in the event a decision is made to attack a hospital or such target that would otherwise hold special protected status, there must be sufficient advanced warning provided that goes unheeded, and then ultimately, if an attack should proceed, that it still adhere to the principles of proportionality.
In each case, Israel has been providing repeated warnings for civilians to evacuate and have created safe passages for them to do so. In circumstances where warranted, the IDF have even aborted what would otherwise be deemed legitimate military strikes. In the meantime, Israel continues to facilitate the provision of humanitarian goods and medical supplies into Gaza, and to the hospitals.
Quite simply, the IDF have gone to unprecedented lengths, not seen in the history of modern warfare, to avoid and minimize civilian casualties, whereas Hamas are doing everything possible to maximise casualties.
Having discharged its duty to provide ample warning, Israel is also adhering to the doctrine of proportionality, that is, should there be any potential loss of civilian life, that it not exceed the military advantage to be gained from such a strike or action.
The goal here is clear: eliminate Hamas, a genocidal terrorist organization that seeks Israel’s destruction, and bring back the hostages, following the heinous October 7th massacre.
If the international community truly cares about the wellbeing of civilians in Gaza and is rightfully aghast at the scenes coming out of Shifa, it would be well advised to direct its outrage at Hamas, which continues to unconscionably and illegally, turn hospitals into their personal control and command centers.
- Monday, March 18, 2024
- Elder of Ziyon
This was posted on Hamas media. It's target audience seems to be whoever reads +972 magazine in Hebrew, because no one else would fall for it.
- Monday, March 18, 2024
- Elder of Ziyon
Our columnist Varda Meyers Epstein (Judean Rose) is in Shaarei Tzedek Hospital in Jerusalem with a serious heart issue.
- Monday, March 18, 2024
- Elder of Ziyon
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon! Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. Read all about it here! |
|
- Monday, March 18, 2024
- Elder of Ziyon
Israel's root problem is that it has embraced the idea of conspiracies and intrigues, and is under the illusion that others are plotting against it to erase it from existence. Thus, it has developed a psychology of hatred, constant morbid fear, hatred, and seeking revenge. The Jews - starting from the punishment inflicted on them by the Assyrian ruler Sargon II, the King of the Levant, Antiochus IV, and the Roman King Titus, and continuing through what the Nazi regime did until the Al-Aqsa Flood attack - were accustomed to attributing the tribulations that befell them to the enemies, and they did not realize at any time that this was from God - even if it was in the hands of humans - to stop corruption and reform themselves.The heavenly books confirm that all these events are planned by God. He does not send His punishments through angels, but rather they are implemented by humans, and all the bearers of these holy books have a special divine law, the summary of which is that when corruption and injustice spread in their societies, God sends down urgent punishments on them so that they pay attention and reform themselves. If the Jews had realized this, the spirit of repentance would have arisen in them and someone who would correct would have arisen among them. Mistakes and changing the course, and be humble and become normal human beings whose actions and reactions are characterized by rationality within the human components around them, but they saw that these persecutions were the result of intrigues and conspiracies, so a spirit of negligence, rebellion, and arrogance was born in them.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon! Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. Read all about it here! |
|
Sunday, March 17, 2024
- Sunday, March 17, 2024
- Elder of Ziyon
The Hamas media office simply makes things up out of thin air. Just as we've seen from the Al Ahli hospital explosion, they will inflate death tolls by 5 times or more. And the media knows it - none of them reported the higher Kuwaiti roundabout figures (that were killed by Palestinian gunmen.) Yet the UN relies on the Hamas media office for its statistics of women and children killed, as well as the total number killed given by the MoH which includes the 13,000 from Hamas, and then the UN figures get reported as factual by the media.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon! Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. Read all about it here! |
|
Dore Gold: Defeating Hamas requires a joint effort from the Western world
Ed Husain is a Muslim professor teaching at Georgetown University in Washington. Last week, he made a startling observation in the London Times. Husain noted, ironically, that the Muslim Brotherhood may be banned in Mecca but actually, it thrives in London.Danny Danon: All Rafah terrorists must be purged
Prof. Husain bravely called for shutting the various arms of the Muslim Brotherhood operating in the United Kingdom, observing that presented danger to British security and British democracy. He observed that Hamas, which is waging a war against Israel in the Gaza Strip, is the Palestinian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood. Moreover, Hamas has vowed to act against Israel again until it succeeds.
True, Hamas has been designated as an international terrorist organization by the European Union (EU), among others, but there has been a disturbing trend in the West to underestimate, to misjudge, and even to misrepresent Hamas and its parent organization, the Muslim Brotherhood.
They have not disavowed their charter or their stated aims. The motto of the Muslim Brotherhood was cosmetically modified after 9-11, now reads: “Jihad is our path; Martyrdom is our aspiration.”
Hamas’s vile assaults on captured Israeli women during and following the October 2023 attacks were not condemned by the Muslim Brotherhood. Indeed many Brotherhood-tied groups shouted their support for what Hamas did. There is no reason to doubt that similar reactions would greet similar atrocities in the future.
The Muslim Brotherhood has global goals
The goals of the Muslim Brotherhood are still global, as the organization reaches out to wider audiences many of whom (Christians, Jews) are themselves targets of the Brotherhood.
But right now the urgent challenge for Israel and the West is Hamas (Arabic: Harakat al-Muqawwima al-Islamiyya – The Islamic Resistance Movement).
Foreign Policy published an analysis in December 2023 of the October attacks on Israel titled “Could Hamas Become a Global Threat?” and the conclusion was yes.
Any call from the world’s representatives for Israel to forgo the operation in Rafah amounts to calling for Israel to surrender to Hamas. Leaving operational Hamas terror cells in Rafah guarantees the regrouping of Hamas and its continuation of its brutal, genocidal path. This unquestionably jeopardizes Israel’s security and paves the path to a recurrence of the atrocities witnessed on October 7, as Hamas’s leaders have promised time and again.Melanie Phillips: The Palestinian Terrorist Authority
This is unthinkable. For Israel, surrendering is not an option. We will never allow our security to be threatened again.
Israel has no choice. Our people have no choice. To decisively win the war and ensure lasting peace, and also to ensure a better life for the people of Gaza, Hamas must be completely demilitarized, and Rafah strongholds must be eradicated to prevent the re-emergence of terrorism and smuggling through Hamas’s elaborate tunnel system under the Philadelphi Corridor. Following this, the entirety of Gaza must be demilitarized completely. Only once this has been achieved can we begin to discuss the day after in Gaza.
We cannot win the war decisively with Hamas remaining operational in any part of Gaza. Rafah is not up for debate, and we will not rest until the full defeat of Hamas.
For western liberals, the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel is the only answer to the Palestinian-Israel conflict.
The Biden administration wants post-war Gaza to be ruled by the Palestinian Authority (PA). This is being resisted by Israel, one of its disagreements with the US over the conduct of the war for which the Biden administration is increasingly punishing it.
The US is impervious to the argument that the PA, no less than Hamas, would turn Gaza once again into a terror state. The Bidenites close their eyes to the copious evidence of PA incitement and rejectionism. They dismiss the huge salaries the PA pays to terrorists incarcerated in Israeli prisons and to the families of terrorists who have been killed.
They ignore the survey published 100 days after the outbreak of the Gaza war which revealed that around 82 per cent of Palestinian Arabs in Judea and Samaria support the October 7 pogrom, and that support for Hamas among the Arabs in Judea and Samaria rose from 12 per cent in September 2023 to 44 per cent in November-December 2023.
Now a startling and important report by the Israeli group Regavim, which works to protect Israel’s land and resources in order to uphold its integrity as a Jewish state, illustrates the insanity of assuming that the PA is a route to peace and security in the region.
Under the 1995 Oslo Agreement, a broad Palestinian security apparatus was established consisting of the Palestinian Police and other security officials who are supposed to combat terrorism and collaborate with Israel on security matters. But the Regavim report, “Officers by Day, Terrorists by Night”, has identified at least 78 members of the Palestinian Authority Security Forces (PASF), many of them officers, who since 2020 have carried out terrorist attacks against Jews.
Since Regavim gathered its information from official PA statements and announcements, this figure is likely to be a significant underestimate.
- Sunday, March 17, 2024
- Elder of Ziyon
- analysis, Daled Amos
By Daled Amos
Hamas has a history of executing Palestinians who the terrorists claim are collaborating with Israel. Back in 2014, for example, the Times of Israel reported that Hamas killed over 30 suspected collaborators with Israel. And that was over just a few days. Of course, there is no way to tell whether Hamas actually executes collaborators, or is killing off opposition to its rule in Gaza.
According to Hamas, collaborating with Israel is not limited to spying for the Jewish state and relaying information that helps to target Hamas terrorists.A Hamas-linked website warned Palestinians who assist Israel in providing aid to Gaza that their actions will not be “tolerated”.Considering how Hamas has been taking Gazan aid for themselves and in some cases selling it to the people at inflated prices, it is understandable that the terrorists might be piqued.
Those who did would be treated as collaborators and be handled with an iron fist, the Hamas Al-Majd security website said on Monday, quoting a security official in Palestinian militant forces.
Hamas is stealing aid and trying to sell it back to Gazans at exorbitant prices. https://t.co/AXQ363orF7
— Haviv Rettig Gur (@havivrettiggur) January 17, 2024
But this time, Hamas may have gone too far. On Thursday, JNS reported, Hamas executes Gaza clan ‘prince’ in message to potential ‘collaborators’:
Hamas has executed a “prince” of the Doghmush clan in Gaza City, sources in Gaza said on Thursday. The killing was a message to those considering cooperating with Israel, which is looking for ways to bypass the terror group in the enclave, according to the sources.
Israel has floated the idea of Gaza clans acting as partners in running the internal affairs of the Strip after Hamas has been eliminated.
If Hamas was trying to dissuade Gazans from participating in Israel's plan, it may have been unnecessary. The clans are reported to have rejected what they considered Israeli interference in internal matters. More to the point, if Hamas felt the need to kill tribal leaders to maintain control, that constitutes a major change in tactics indicating that Hamas is afraid of losing control.
On March 10, Khaled Abu Toameh reported that Hamas was competing with the PA to get the support of the clans:
The P.A. and Hamas understand that the backing of the clans is crucial for maintaining their control over the Palestinians in both the West Bank and Gaza Strip. That’s why P.A. and Hamas leaders have always treated the large families and their leaders with utmost respect. In some instances, clan leaders were elevated to the unofficial position of supreme judges and arbitrators, replacing the official judiciary and law enforcement of both organizations.
This is all the more reason to see the Hamas execution of a clan leader as an admission of a potential threat to Hamas control in Gaza. The fact that Hamas killed the leader supports Toameh's report that some of the clans sided with the PA and were enforcing law and order in some of the towns and refugee camps, preventing looting and anarchy. And one clan was in fact reported to be escorting some of the trucks carrying humanitarian aid that entered through Egypt and Israel.
This is not the first time Hamas has sparked revenge over their killing of an Arab. This past November, a Bedouin family accused Hamas of torturing, humiliating, and executing Osama Abu Asa during the October 7 massacre. They offered a reward of $1 million for help in identifying who killed him. An uncle made clear, "as with the bedouins, we have a blood feud with the terrorists. This account will be closed, no matter how long it takes.”
But this time, the backlash is against all of Hamas: Major Gaza clan says it considers all Hamas members legitimate targets after leader assassinated:
The Doghmosh Family — a major clan in Gaza — has issued a statement declaring that all Hamas members are legitimate targets after its leader was assassinated by members of the terror group along with ten other relatives allegedly for stealing humanitarian aid and being in contact with Israel.
The statement pledges retribution against all responsible and warns Hamas fighters not to test the clan’s patience.
How serious is this threat to Hamas?
On November 9, 2005, the leader of Al Qaeda in Iraq, al-Zarqawi, claimed responsibility for the three suicide bombers who killed 60 people at hotels in Amman Jordan. He was rebuked by members of his own tribe.
“We, the sons of the Bani Hassan tribe in all its branches in the Hashemite kingdom of Jordan, support and express solidarity with our cousins, the al-Khalayleh clan, and their decision to sever relations with the terrorist Ahmad Fadheel Nazzal al-Khalayleh, who calls himself Abu Musab al-Zarqawi,” said the letter published in four leading newspapers.
...In a similar letter on Nov. 20, almost 60 members of al-Zarqawi’s extended family disowned him and pledged fidelity to the crown.
This signaled the beginning of al-Zarqawi's downfall. He was killed in a US airstrike the following year.
We can only hope that the blood feud Hamas has brought upon itself, from Arabs who have outright threatened to kill Hamas members, will have similar results.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon! Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. Read all about it here! |
|
- Sunday, March 17, 2024
- Elder of Ziyon
The France-based multinational retailer Carrefour Group is involved in war crimes committed by the Israeli regime of occupation, settler-colonialism and apartheid over the Palestinian people.Now, some Saudi products were photographed, apparently in an Israeli Carrefour supermarket, with the "Saudi Made" label.
Hardly a day goes by without hearing or seeing signs of Saudi normalization with the Israeli occupation, and during the past weeks, Saudi products have flooded Israeli markets.Activists linked this to the ‘Shameful Road’, the land route inaugurated to connect several Arab countries with the Israeli entity, leading to the port of Haifa in Israel.In the past two days, activists on social media circulated photos of products from the “SABIC” company, one of the largest companies in the Kingdom’s chemical sector, as well as “Luna” cheese and ghee, and Aafia oil, displayed in Carrefour Israel stores.
I'm upset too. None of these products appear to have any kosher certification!
- Sunday, March 17, 2024
- Elder of Ziyon
Saturday, March 16, 2024
Shattered
When Israelis speak about Oct. 7, they frequently say “there are no words.” But one word they consistently use is “shattered.”Sharansky: Oslo sowed the seeds for the October 7 massacre
Israeli psychologists have been treating severe trauma, complex trauma and collective trauma. The word “trauma,” however, fails to convey the scale, the savagery or the sadism of events that day. The term does not encompass the complex mix of disorientation, anguish, emotional overload and the experience of utter brokenness after the deadliest day for Jews since the Holocaust.
There is no word for the shock felt by Jews around the world when Israel was suddenly and without warning attacked by thousands of rockets targeting civilians from the north to the south and from the river to the sea. There is no word to describe what it is like to be a Jew kidnapped by terrorists indoctrinated since early childhood to believe that murdering Jews is rewarded in the afterlife. Or to know that the people you love are in the hands of terrorists who delight in rape, torture and slaughter; who enjoy forcing parents and children to watch as they inflict horrors on loved ones.
There is no word to convey the terrifying ordeal suffered by survivors of the attempted genocide that Hamas perpetrated on Oct. 7. There is no word that communicates the panic, betrayal, horror and distress of those who hid for hours waiting for help to come, reading WhatsApp messages about terrorists inside their neighbors’ houses. Hearing terrorists break into their own homes. Hearing the screams of injured and dying friends and relatives. Hearing sounds of gunfire and exploding RPGs punctuated by ecstatic shouts of “Allahu Akbar.” All the while knowing they were being hunted.
Everyone in Israel is just one or two degrees of separation from someone who was murdered, injured or kidnapped on Oct. 7. And everyone knows someone who sped to the rescue that day, many of whom never returned.
There is no word to describe the grief of a country still holding its breath while more than a hundred hostages remain in Gaza, and while hundreds of thousands of soldiers, many in their teens and early 20s, go to battle. Some returning badly injured. Some returning to be buried.
Israel, which in the 20th century absorbed hundreds of thousands of displaced Holocaust survivors as well as nearly 900,000 Jewish refugees fleeing antisemitism and violence in neighboring Arab countries, is now temporarily housing about 200,000 displaced Israelis — refugees in their own country — some in hotels and even dormitories.
This includes not only those evacuated from areas near the Gaza border, but also from the north, as confrontations with terrorists in Lebanon escalate. Many displaced families are unsure how long it will take before they can return home. Some refugees from the south have already returned. Some don’t have homes to return to. Some don’t know if they want to return.
There is no word in the psychological lexicon for what happened on Oct. 7 or the new world in which Israelis now live. But “shattered” comes closer than “trauma.”
THE DISCUSSION quickly turns to Oct. 7 and the “shocking” and “terrible” failure beforehand of Israel’s intelligence community and of the IDF that day. He says that everyone wants "to fight back and restore peace, but our perception of our security changed that day.”Seth Frantzman: Why wasn’t October 7 prevented? Time to look to the West
On the other hand, he says, “I think so much good has come out of our people” since the massacre. “In one day, we went from being a polarized society to the most united. Suddenly, it was clear that the whole year of these mutual accusations was not in the hearts of the people.
“I am sure there will be at least two new parties in the next elections: one to the left of Likud, and one to the right, with new faces for everyone.”
But Sharansky cannot let go of what he believes was the catalyst for the Gaza war: the Oslo Accords, meaning that the seeds of Oct. 7 were planted 30 years ago. He says the Olso approach essentially communicated that “It’s not our business, and it’s not important for us in what kind of society the Palestinians live” but rather that Israel “find a dictator who can guarantee our stability.”
“That was the idea of Oslo,” Sharansky explains. “We are bringing [Yasser] Arafat. We know that he is a ruthless dictator. And we say to the Palestinians, ‘Whether you want it or not, he will be your leader.’ And we say to ourselves, ‘Our prime minister said that it’s good he [Arafat] is not restricted by democracy because that’s how he will defeat Hamas much quicker than we can do it.’”
Sharansky opposed Oslo because he believed Arafat would quickly understand that the only way he could maintain power by force was to find an external enemy. “What other external enemy would he have except us?” he asks. “A lot of public money was put into Arafat’s account so he would be loyal to us. And it failed big.”
The former minister says that not only did Arafat fail to defeat Hamas, but “Hamas defeated him.”
Then came the Disengagement in 2005 and the vision that Israel could separate from Gaza. Sharansky was the first minister to resign over the idea.
It’s not that he does not want peace or believe it is achievable, Sharansky stresses. Rather, he does not think Israeli and world leaders have gone about obtaining it in the right way. He calls former prime minister Shimon Peres “primitive and a neo-Marxist,” having fully bought into a blissful vision of Mideast peace.
“He was so popular because of his optimism,” Sharansky says of Peres. “I am also optimistic, but I am not naive.” Former prime minister Yitzhak Rabin, he opines, was more realistic but felt it was worthwhile to proceed.
He says he does not believe that then-prime minister Ariel Sharon really felt the Disengagement would achieve its goal. Sharon told Sharansky that he thought if Israel separated from Gaza and gave the Gazans complete independence, Israel would have 10 years of international approval – and be able to respond if Gazans carried out attacks against the Jewish state.
“I told him, ‘We don’t have 10 years; we don’t have 10 days,’” Sharansky says. “I was wrong. We had a couple of months.
“We are paying a very big price for our attempts,” he continues, speaking quickly. “We have no choice now. If we want to continue to exist as a state, we have to destroy Hamas. We have to take control over the security.”
While Israel will need to investigate its own failures on and leading up to October 7, there is also enough blame to go around Western nations.
Hamas is hosted by Qatar, a major non-NATO ally of the US. Doha is also close to many other western countries. In addition, Turkey, a member of NATO backs Hamas. As such, two of the West’s closest allies in the Middle East are both closely connected to Hamas.
How did Hamas plan the greatest mass murder of Jews in a single day since the Holocaust while also being hosted by western allies? How is it possible that western allies hosted and backed Hamas while western governments knew nothing about the plans for October 7?
These are important questions because October 7 was certainly not in the interests of Israel or Gazans. More than 200,000 Israelis had to be evacuated in its wake, and Hezbollah’s supporting rocket fire.
'Ceasefire' calls amid post-Oct. 7 realities
Some 1,200 people were killed in Israel and 253 were taken hostage. Israel’s inevitable response has been massive. Most countries in the region as well as in the West would surely have wanted to avoid this war. Pro-Palestinian activists across the West demand a ceasefire and there are fears of a wider regional war Gaza war and famine in Gaza.
All of this could have been prevented, not just by more vigilant Israeli protection of its Gaza border. October 7 could not possibly have been carried out by a handful of terrorists alone. Hamas has never carried out such a complex attack. In fact, Hamas has only recently become powerful enough to conceive of such an attack. Its sophistication point to foreign support and advice.
Reports have shown that Hamas cyber and intelligence capabilities have expanded in recent years. It expanded its rocket arsenal and ability to fire large barrages of rockets simultaneously. It expanded its knowledge of Israel’s border fence electronics and sought to use new methods to outsmart artificial intelligence-driven technologies.
In addition to two Western backers Hamas’s main backer is Iran. After October 7, Russia and China did not condemn Hamas and have appeared to excuse its attack. In addition, the Iranian regime sent its foreign minister to Qatar to congratulate the Hamas high command.